1. Opinion

Column: Get rid of Trump with the 25th Amendment, not impeachment

A large portion of President Trump’s own party understands how erratic and dangerous he has become.
Published Oct. 15, 2017

Even before Donald Trump became president, people were wondering how long it would be before his behavior became so atrocious or erratic or corrupt that he'd be driven from office. In many ways, Trump has proven to be even worse than we feared. Not only has he not grown and matured, if anything he has become even more infantile and cretinous.

So it isn't surprising to hear Democrats seriously consider whether he ought to be impeached.

But let's have some straight talk: A Trump impeachment is only a remote possibility, and promoting it now doesn't do anyone any good. In fact, if Trump is removed before his first term is over, it's far more likely to happen via the 25th Amendment — in other words, it'll be Republicans who do the deed.

To be sure, it's hard to avoid the impeachment question. Last week, Democratic mega-donor Tom Steyer sent a letter to party leaders demanding that Democrats running for office pledge to impeach Trump if they take control of Congress. There are also Democrats in the House who want to push for impeachment, but for the moment Nancy Pelosi, who thinks it's a bad idea, is keeping them in check.

You can look at an impeachment pledge as a symbolic act, a way of showing the party base that you'll fight him to the end. In that sense it would be kind of like the 60 or so times Republicans voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act — it didn't accomplish anything real, but it was a way of demonstrating their commitment to total opposition. In practical terms, however, nothing Trump has done to this point is going to generate impeachment. Steyer's bill of particulars amounts to, "He's done a lot of bad stuff," which is undoubtedly true. But in order to impeach a president successfully, he'll have to have committed acts that are so clearly high crimes and misdemeanors that even members of his own party feel they have no choice but to remove him from office.

And we're just not there yet. If Democrats took the House and voted to impeach Trump, Republicans would immediately close ranks around him, no matter how displeased they are with his performance. There would be zero chance of getting the 67 votes in the Senate required for a conviction, and in the end it would seem to voters like a gigantic waste of time, just as it did when Republicans impeached Bill Clinton.

To be clear, I'm not saying you can't make a case that Trump's misrule is what the Framers had in mind when they wrote impeachment into the Constitution, because you can. Nor am I saying that Trump might not do things in the future — or may have already done things that we haven't yet discovered — that will be so awful that impeachment will be the only reasonable course. But given the political reality of our age, we're a ways from that point, and it's hard to see what is accomplished by demanding that Democrats support impeachment now.

There is, however, an even more likely way that Trump might be removed from office: the 25th Amendment.

There's been a lot of talk about Trump being unfit to hold the office of the presidency, and he absolutely is, by any standard you could devise. His own aides treat him like an unruly toddler who has to be tricked and manipulated into not causing too much damage, an effort that often requires them to go to unusual lengths.

A large portion of his own party understands how erratic and dangerous Trump has become. You'll notice that when Sen. Bob Corker described the White House as an "adult day care," his GOP colleagues avoided answering questions about it — but none came forward to say that Corker was wrong.

So it isn't hard to imagine a scenario in which something dramatic happens, like a crisis that Trump mishandles or a dangerous order he issues that his underlings refuse to carry out, after which the GOP collectively says, "Enough is enough." According to the 25th Amendment, if the vice president and a majority of the cabinet declare to Congress "that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President."

There's a somewhat complicated process that would then ensue, with the president having the opportunity to force a congressional vote on his fate. But if the vice president and most of the cabinet have already taken that dramatic step, chances are it would be a fait accompli. That outcome is more likely than impeachment because it would mean Republicans deciding themselves to remove Trump, which would at least somewhat lessen the feeling that it was a strictly partisan battle.

Here's the reality Republicans will have to grapple with: If Trump is removed, either through impeachment or the 25th Amendment, it will be a political calamity that will haunt them for years. Even if some measure of normalcy and order is restored under President Pence — who from my point of view as a liberal would be an awful president, but who at least would be unlikely to start a war because somebody insulted him on Twitter — the GOP would almost certainly suffer terrible electoral defeats in the short term and profound damage to its reputation in the long term. Trump's status as the worst president in American history would be secured (and yes, he'll probably get there regardless). Republicans would be hounded and ashamed by their support for him (and yes, they should be anyway).

Republicans would have to decide that's a price they're willing to pay in order to remove Trump from office. But it's going to take extraordinary events between now and then, and his fate is going to lie in the hands of his own party. At least until 2020.

Washington Post


  1. 2 hours ago• Opinion
    Editorial cartoon for Thursday from Times wire services LISA BENSON  |  Washington Post Syndicate
  2. Yesterday• Opinion
    Plumes of steam drift from the cooling tower of FirstEnergy Corp.'s Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor, Ohio. RON SCHWANE  |  AP
    Thursday’s letters to the editor
  3. Nearly three dozen trees were cut down at a half-abandoned trailer park along Gandy Boulevard in August, enraging tree advocates and sparking another battle between the city of Tampa and a new state law that removes local government authority over tree removal. [CHARLIE FRAGO | Times]
    The Florida Legislature made it easier for residents to cut down trees without permission from local government. Now everybody wants to do it.
  4. Editorial cartoons for Wednesday from Times wire services Andy Marlette/Creators Syndicate
  5. The M-16 is a pure military weapon. File photo
    Wednesday’s letters to the editor
  6. State Rep. Chris Sprowls, 35, R-Palm Harbor, speaks Tuesday after Republicans selected him as the next House speaker.  Associated Press I Caina Calvan BOBBY CAINA CALVAN  |  AP
    The Palm Harbor Republican will become the second Florida House speaker from Pinellas.
  7. Hernando County community news Tara McCarty
  8. editorial cartoon from times wires Andy Marlette -- Pensacola News Journal
  9. Governor Ron DeSantis. [OCTAVIO JONES   |   Times] "OCTAVIO JONES   |   TIMES"  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Here’s what readers had to say in Tuesday’s paper.
  10. Chris Corr is the president of Raydient Places & Properties, Rayonier, and the chair of the Florida Council of 100, a nonpartisan group of business and civic leaders. Tim Nickens
    The Council of 100 focuses on new strategies to recruit and retain the best teachers. | Column