1. Opinion

Column: New federal 'conscience rule' puts patients' rights at risk

President Donald Trump speaks, with Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar by his side, in the Rose Garden of the White House on Friday. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Jabin Botsford
President Donald Trump speaks, with Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar by his side, in the Rose Garden of the White House on Friday. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Jabin Botsford
Published Jun. 7, 2019


Special to the Tampa Bay Times

A rule issued last month by the recently created "Conscience and Religious Freedom" division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights attempts to force secular systems to allow religious doctrine — not patient values — to dictate their patient care.

This final "conscience rule" allows any individual or entity involved in a patient's care — from a hospital's board of directors to the receptionist that schedules procedures — to put their personal beliefs ahead of a patient's health and values without any duty to make sure somebody else treats them. Hospitals that don't follow this directive will lose their federal funding for patient services.

Doctors should have a right to decline to treat a patient if they are morally opposed, and they already have this right. This new rule gives them the ability to impose their beliefs on a dying person.

A doctor who refuses to prescribe adequate pain medication with no referral to another doctor could seek protection under this rule.

Even the designated health care proxy carrying out a loved one's wishes as written in their advance directive will be powerless if a health care staff person objects. Dying patients with no hope of a cure may be forced to remain in a persistent vegetative state against their stated wishes; endure repeated electric shocks to their heart to resuscitate them, instead of allowing a peaceful passing; endure agonizing, life-prolonging treatments, even if they have suffered from dementia for decades.

This new federal rule will turbo charge the impact the Catholic Church religious directives and others have on thwarting patients' preferences for end-of-life care. These directives are inconsistent with the beliefs of two out of three Americans — and seven out of ten Catholic Americans, according to a survey conducted by Lifeway Research online, a Christian-based research company.

Under this rule, health care providers won't be required to give patients a referral, abandoning them during their greatest time of need. And health systems will be forced to allow their workers' religious beliefs to trump their patients' values or lose critical federal funding if they don't comply with the rule. Even more concerning is that government attorneys, funded with taxpayer dollars, would be available to sue health care entities who sanction workers who disregard patients stated or documented preferences.

This federal rule may be unconstitutional. In fact, the rule puts individual religious beliefs above the constitutional right recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health to refuse unwanted medical treatment. For example, it would allow any employee to refuse a patient's request to discontinue life-sustaining treatment.

It could take years before our legal team joins forces with others to overturn this rule. In the meantime, unfortunately, more people will be needlessly suffering rather than peacefully dying.

Kim Callinan is CEO of Compassion & Choices. She earned a graduate certificate in public health from the University of South Florida.


  1.  [Chip Bok --]
  2. Teachers and supporters march during the Florida Education Association's "Take on Tallahassee" rally at the Old Capitol in Tallahassee. [PHIL SEARS  |  AP]
    Here’s what readers are saying in Saturday’s letters to the editor.
  3. Florida's unemployment rate hit a record low in December. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File) [LYNNE SLADKY  |  AP]
    Nearly every major job sector posted gains from a year earlier.
  4. The entrance to Moffit Cancer Center in Tampa. [Courtesy of Moffitt Cancer Center]
    The secret jobs and payments provided by China to researchers at the University of Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center are greater than initially reported. A House committee should keep investigating.
  5. The Florida Aquarium celebrates its 25th year. And it has much to show for it.
    A magnet in Tampa Bay for tourism, conservation and regional growth.
  6. Mac Stipanovich
    Whether it’s regulating the collection of voter signatures on the front end or passing new laws on the back end, they seek to silence the voices of the governed.
  7. St. Petersburg Police Chief Anthony Holloway and U.S. Attorney, Middle District of Florida, Maria Chapa Lopez, announced the Department of Justice awarded a $741,556 grant to the St. Petersburg Police Department for three years to create a regional Tampa Bay Human Trafficking Task Force at the department. [SCOTT KEELER  |  TAMPA BAY TIMES]
    The Tampa Bay Human Trafficking Force is a unique opportunity to bridge the gap of local law enforcement and reduce human trafficking.
  8. A rule proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation this week would allow airlines to crack down on personal pets that are carried aboard as so-called service animals. [MARK SCHIEFELBEIN  |  AP]
    Trained dogs are fine. Pigs and turkeys—uh, no.
  9.  [Andy Marlette -- Pensacola News Journal]
  10. Farmers in Florida have the potential to make real impact in the climate crisis, according to these columnists.
    We need science to show how farms can capture more carbon, how forests and pastures can clean more air.