Advertisement
  1. Opinion

Column: The abortion debate and the morality of personal choice versus natural law

Published Jun. 14

BY LILY ABADAL

Special to the Tampa Bay Times

The recent abortion bans in Alabama and Georgia have brought the controversy of abortion back to the center of public discourse. Debates on the issue are rooted in two different perspectives. Pro-choice advocates function within the framework of personal rights; they judge the morality of government intervention through the lens of consent. In other words, women should have the right to make their own choices about their own bodies. Anything that prevents women from doing so, according to this ethical framework, is unjust. Thus, limiting access to abortion is unjust.

On the other side, pro-lifers envision morality through the lens of natural law and virtue. Ethical action is not about increasing autonomy or free choice, per se. Instead, it is about protecting intrinsic values — life, community, health, knowledge. The virtuous individual would not act in such a way that intentionally undermines these values. Willful ignorance is unjust because it hinders the intrinsic value of knowledge. Abortion is unjust because it undermines the value of human life. Clearly, each side stands upon different ethical foundations — choice and the intrinsic value of human life, respectively.

Now, the pro-life side, because it prioritizes certain intrinsic values over choice, is often depicted as anti-women. While pro-lifers do not regard choice as the fundamental ethical value, they are not anti-women. In fact, abortion has shaped our modern culture in ways that have not empowered women. Instead, abortion has been used as a tool to reinforce patriarchal ideals.

First, let us analyze the notion that restricting access to abortion would keep women from positions of power economically and socially. Society believes this because economic and social power has been defined by masculine ideals. If women have a child, this means they will have to spend more time at home. They will have to take care of a baby. It is assumed that women have to drive their children to soccer practices and prepare the meals. It is assumed that women will have to meet with teachers and plan social outings. The professional lives of women are interrupted by children because women are supposed to be more involved in their children's lives than men. As fathers, men are expected to prioritize their work over their children. As mothers, women are expected to prioritize their children over their work.

All of this being said, women are measured by an ideal of masculinity that has been formed by industrialization and capitalism. The ideal is this: Put your home life in a box and forget about it while you are at work. The assumption is that fathers can do this and that mothers cannot. Aside from the fact that this is an unhealthy expectation, women are expected to "be like men" in the workplace. Instead of challenging these masculine ideals, women are told that abortion is the means to their liberation and success in the workplace. It is a tool of reinforcing capitalistic values and masculine ideals about professional character.

Furthermore, let's consider the fact that not all abortions are freely chosen. Young women are manipulated by parents or guardians who do not want to carry the shame and financial burden of having a pregnant teen. Men in charge of sex-trafficking rings drag abused women to abortion clinics so they can continue exploiting their bodies. Some men have forced women into getting abortions so they can avoid scandal and maintain appearances. Are women liberated by their abortions here? No, they are controlled and told they are useful insofar as they provide men pleasure. This hardly seems like a means for female empowerment.

To be clear, the pro-choice movement is not pro-women; it is pro-choice. On the contrary, the pro-life movement is not anti-women; it is pro-life. I think there are far better ways to empower women than by sending them to abortion clinics. For starters, put an end to the exploitation and commodification of women's bodies, even if sex sells more cologne and buffalo wings. Maybe, just maybe, we can dare to see value in emotional vulnerability, even though this is not a traditionally masculine trait. Maybe we should demand more family-friendliness from our employers, our universities, and our public spaces. At the end of the day, should we use abortion to reinforce oppressive values that enable the abuse of women and reinforce patriarchal ideals or should we protect the intrinsic value of human life, female and male?

Lily Abadal is director of experiential learning at St. Petersburg Catholic High School and is a Ph.D candidate in philosophy and religion at the University of South Florida.

ALSO IN THIS SECTION

  1. The American flag flies in front of the U.S. Capitol dome at sunset on Capitol Hill in Washington.
    Here’s some interesting commentary from the opposite poles of the political spectrum.
  2. Here’s what readers had to say in Sunday’s letters to the editor.
  3. Editorial cartoon for Saturday/Sunday Andy Marlette/Creators Syndicate
  4. Stock photo. MORGAN DAVID DE LOSSY  |  Getty Images/iStockphoto
    I’m a new mom -- again -- and please remember that many mothers would welcome government policies that make it easier for them to stay home with their kids than returning to work. | Column
  5. Josh Hensley, 43, was found in the waters of Kings Bay in Crystal River. He was known for dressing as Jack Sparrow. Facebook
    Here’s what readers had to say in Saturday’s letters to the editor.
  6. David Colburn was the former provost and senior vice president of the University of Florida. JAMIE FRANCIS  |  Tampa Bay Times
    He believed that diversity is our strength, and that the way to overcome division is to shine light in dark corners, writes Cynthia Barnett.
  7. Adam Goodman, national Republican media consultant
    With Washington once again failing to embrace reforms following mass shootings, it’s up to Americans to create a movement to demand change. | Adam Goodman
  8. Couple, Lewis Bryan, 36, (back left) and Amber Eckloff, 33, pose for a portrait with their children, (From left) D'Angelo Eckloff, 14, Rasmus Bryan, 4, Ramiro Bryan, 10, Lothario Bryan, 6, and Alonzo Bailey, 17. The family has been living at the Bayway Inn on 34th St S. Friday, Aug. 30, 2019 in St. Petersburg.  MARTHA ASENCIO-RHINE   |   TIMES  |  Tampa Bay Times
    When about 40 percent of city households are spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing, something has to change.
  9. A judge ruled in June that it is up to Hillsborough County Commissioners to decide how much money the bus agency and other transportation projects get from the one-cent transportation sales tax voters approved in November. The board did just that this week.[SCOTT KEELER   |   Times]
    Hillsborough commissioners follow through on transportation funding.
  10. From left to right: Florida Department of Transportation workers inspect damage to the Interstate 175 overpass at Sixth Street S caused by a roll-off dumpster truck that left its hydraulic arm upright, according to St. Petersburg police [JAMES BORCHUCK | Tampa Bay Times]; Former Pinellas school guardian Erick Russell, 37, is accused of pawning the Glock 17 9mm semiautomatic pistol, body armor and two magazines he was issued to protect students [Pinellas County Sheriff's Office]; Johnna Lynn Flores [AUSTIN ANTHONY | Tampa Bay Times] Tampa Bay Times
    Here are three examples of routine information Tampa Bay governments kept from the public this week.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement