1. Opinion

Dockery: As truth spreads, support for Amendment 1 drops

Published Nov. 3, 2016

Amendment 1, the deceptive utility-backed solar amendment, once looked certain for passage on Tuesday. Polls showed voters overwhelmingly supported the amendment, mistakenly believing it was pro-solar.

True, solar proponents are outgunned. The powerful and deep-pocketed group behind Amendment 1 was brilliantly devious in crafting the amendment language. They squeaked by Florida Supreme Court review on a 4-3 vote and had $22 million to spend.

Solar enthusiasts had almost nothing — and solar's popularity was working against them as voters were tricked into believing the utility-backed amendment was pro-solar. What a bitter irony, the successful result of their decades of advocating for solar being turned into support for changing the Florida Constitution to restrict it.

The Saint Leo University Polling Institute conducted a series of polls measuring support for Amendment 1. In its June 2016 poll, 77.3 percent of likely voters supported the ballot measure. In August the poll showed 81.4 percent support and in September it grew to an incredible 84 percent. It takes 60 percent of the vote for a constitutional amendment to pass.

The utility-backed group sent out numerous glossy mailers — I got four — that painted this as mom and apple pie. Its TV ads blanketed the airwaves and were also top-quality deception. They even got crooner Pat Boone to record a robocall to reach Florida's seniors. Money was no object and they smelled victory.

Solar proponents screamed a little louder. The news media weighed in. Radio stations and some television stations started to air both sides of the issue. Columnists such as Carl Hiaasen penned powerful and persuasive columns.

Word started to spread across social media. Jimmy Buffet, a strong environmental voice, even posted a video with a handmade sign saying, "No on 1." Popular former governor and U.S. Sen. Bob Graham forcefully opposed it.

A true low-cost grassroots effort began. A few "Vote No on 1" signs popped up in yards and as icons on Facebook.

Many newspapers editorially opposed Amendment 1 — at least 23 papers have already publicly called for its defeat.

Reporters ran stories on the true intent of the amendment's backers. Mary Ellen Klas of the Times/Herald Tallahassee bureau exposed how an insider revealed their strategy at a conference in Nashville.

Caught on tape, Sal Nuzzo, policy director at the James Madison Institute who worked with the utilities on the amendment, called it "an incredibly savvy maneuver" that "would completely negate anything the pro-solar interests would try to do either legislatively or constitutionally down the road." He called it a bit of political jiu-jitsu.

His comments confirmed what pro-solar Amendment 1 opponents had been claiming. The utility-backed effort was intended to restrict third-party sales of rooftop solar by misleading voters and making them believe, falsely, that Amendment 1 will expand solar use.

Spend your days with Hayes

Spend your days with Hayes

Subscribe to our free Stephinitely newsletter

Columnist Stephanie Hayes will share thoughts, feelings and funny business with you every Monday.

You’re all signed up!

Want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? Let’s get started.

Explore all your options

The truth is out, word is spreading and momentum is building.

The latest Saint Leo poll released on Monday shows support has dropped 24 percentage points to 59.8 percent — just under the 60 percent needed for passage!

Four additional facts were presented to the respondents supporting Amendment 1:

• You already have the right to own solar equipment;

• It may restrict your ability to lease solar equipment from third-party vendors;

• It may restrict your ability to send back excess energy to offset your costs;

• It's backed by Florida utility companies.

Each of the facts eroded support to some degree. When all four were taken into consideration, support for Amendment 1 dropped to 35.4 percent. The more voters know about it, the less they like it.

Perhaps that's why the utilities just threw in another $3.5 million — bringing their total to $26 million. And they recruited the firefighters — beloved by voters — to be the new face of the amendment.

Ignore their clever ads. Help spread the truth. Don't let the utility industry deceive you into supporting restrictions on solar expansion by disguising it as pro-solar.

Wouldn't it be great for the little guy to win one?

Paula Dockery is a syndicated columnist who served in the Florida Legislature for 16 years as a Republican from Lakeland. She can be reached at


This site no longer supports your current browser. Please use a modern and up-to-date browser version for the best experience.

Chrome Firefox Safari Edge