1. Opinion

Ruth: Broadband's bawdy breach

Published Sep. 5, 2014

Perhaps you aspire to fame and fortune, the chance to walk the red carpet at the Oscars to the cooing of adoring fans and to have gossip columnists taking note that you were seen spooling pasta at Wolfgang Puck's while canoodling with another international sex symbol.

Career planning — it's a wonderful thing.

But as with all matters of the cult of celebrity, there is a cautionary tale.

Apparently there is an unwritten rule in the world of being a VIP (Very Important Pin-up) that requires having naked pictures of yourself taken by a paramour, which eventually — much to your carefully orchestrated chagrin — make their way into the cheesy cybersphere.

Such was the fate recently for actors Jennifer Lawrence and Mary Elizabeth Winstead along with supermodel Kate Upton, among other Hollywood stars, who learned that photographs of them in the altogether had been absconded with and posted all over the Internet.

The aggrieved parties lamented that their privacy was cruelly violated by shameless, twisted oafs with considerable hacking skills to worm their way into the iPad and cellphone accounts of famous and semi-famous people.

Once again the debate has been joined over privacy rights and the responsibilities of snoopy Internet outlets such as Twitter, Facebook, 4chan and Reddit to better police their sites and remove offensive material that debases innocent victims of cyber-stalking.

This isn't about the First Amendment. Free speech rights don't extend to stealing compromising images of private (albeit well-known) citizens and displaying them for the prurient dining and dancing pleasure of others.

However … isn't there always a however?

The offended parties to the cyber peep show are hardly strangers to photographic flesh peddling. For example, the Internet is awash with images of Upton from her various Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions wearing not much more than a salacious wardrobe-malfunction-in-waiting.

And while Lawrence is a terrific actor with an Academy Award to her name for Silver Linings Playbook, she, too, has been frequently photographed in public leaving precious little to the imagination.

And as for that noted thespian Mary Elizabeth Winstead, her naughty purloined pictorial probably captured a greater audience than her tour de farce performance in Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, leaving audiences anxiously awaiting "Millard Fillmore: Godzilla Slayer."

What was done to these women by the cyber trolls is an egregious encroachment on their privacy.

But don't you also suspect that when you achieve a certain degree of recognition, if your lover and/or spouse says to you: "Hey sugarplum, how about I take a bunch of naked photos of you," the siren warnings should be blaring?

At the risk of committing prudery, who does this sort of stuff without considering the possibility their au natural exhibitionism won't show up on a laptop in Kurdistan?

These celebrities aren't stupid. By the time a Jennifer Lawrence, or a Kate Upton, or even a Mary Elizabeth Winstead reaches a certain status by marketing their attractiveness in the show business racket, they have to know any photo taken of them, especially involving an absence of clothing, is all but destined to find its way to the sleaze-o-sphere.

These three aren't the first celebrities to have their private accounts hacked and saucy photos uplinked into the Inter-hoochie-coochie. And thus for the umpteenth time, Lawrence, Upton and Winstead et al. have learned a lesson they ought to have already learned. The "Delete" key is nothing more than a delusion.

When the cyber-photo pimps put their minds to it, passwords can be compromised. Multiple filters of security can be breached. And no birthday suit is safe from becoming a global peep show.

Apparently the FBI is hot on the mousepad to track down the Internet interlopers who wormed their way into the cyber accounts of the celebrities. Then what?

Considering the photos are ricocheting around the world, the likelihood of eventually snagging the soft-porn perpetrators would seem problematic.

But if some of those trading in the bawdy pictures of Hollywood's starlets are nabbed, would a fine and prison term really send a message to other lowlifes to respect the privacy of others?

Probably not. But posting naked photos of the smarmy cyber-brigands on the Internet might send a message that what's good for the gorgeous is good for the panderer.


  1. Sarah Rumschlag and her son Henry Rumschlag, 7, of St. Petersburg march during the science rally and march at Poynter Park in St. Pete. KAIJO, CHARLIE  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Here’s what readers had to say in Friday’s letters to the editor.
  2. The line for free HIV testing during the Pinellas County World AIDS Day event at Williams Park in St. Petersburg. LUKE JOHNSON  |  Tampa Bay Times
    The state has mishandled the epidemic in the past, but lawmakers can get it right now. | Column
  3. The Florida Power & Light solar facility is seen in Arcadia. CHRIS URSO  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Help the markets determine winners in the renewables the Sunshine State needs. | Column
  4.  Jim Morin -- MorinToons Syndicate
  5. Noah McAdams, 3, has leukemia, and his parents didn't want to go along with the chemotherapy his doctors prescribed. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office
    The state acted correctly by interceding on behalf of Noah McAdams, a 4-year-old leukemia patient.
  6. Stephen A. Schwarzman, CEO of the Blackstone Group, speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, earlier this year. MARKUS SCHREIBER  |  AP
    The billionaire also talks trade with China in an interview with the Tampa Bay Times.
  7. Editorial cartoon for Thursday from Times wire services LISA BENSON  |  Washington Post Syndicate
  8. Yesterday• Opinion
    Plumes of steam drift from the cooling tower of FirstEnergy Corp.'s Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor, Ohio. RON SCHWANE  |  AP
    Thursday’s letters to the editor
  9. Nearly three dozen trees were cut down at a half-abandoned trailer park along Gandy Boulevard in August, enraging tree advocates and sparking another battle between the city of Tampa and a new state law that removes local government authority over tree removal. [CHARLIE FRAGO | Times]
    The Florida Legislature made it easier for residents to cut down trees without permission from local government. Now everybody wants to do it.
  10. Editorial cartoons for Wednesday from Times wire services Andy Marlette/Creators Syndicate