1. Opinion

Ruth: Don't tie SAT scores to teacher pay

Incoming Speaker Rep. Richard Corcoran, R-Land O’Lakes, and Rep. Ritch Workman, R-Melbourne, listen to debate Tuesday on the floor of the House.
Published Mar. 9, 2016

Do you ever get the sense there is a secret room in the state capitol where every morning legislators gather for a solemn ritual?

First, they don their sacred Bozo the Clown robes, followed by a rendition of the Three Stooges anthem Three Blind Mice, concluding with a ceremonial tossing of a custard pie.

And then Tallahassee's answer to Romper Room with a wet bar gets down to the serious business of trying to be even more half-witted than it was the day before. This is no simple task.

But they try, and that's the important thing.

A good example of the Florida Legislature achieving new lows of ineptitude can be found in a measure passed by both the House and the Senate to dole out bonuses to so-called "highly effective" teachers based on their SAT/ACT scores from a test educators took years before they started their job. It's called the "Best & Brightest" teacher bonus program, with $49 million to be doled out on the basis of a standard that has absolutely nothing to do with whether someone is a wonderful teacher. This is a bit like bestowing bonuses on police officers because they did a bang-up job as a 13-year-old elementary school crossing guard.

In order to benefit from the Legislature's parallel universe slush fund, a teacher must be tagged as "highly effective" and to have scored in the top 20 percent in the year they took the SAT/ACT while still in high school.

First year teachers in Florida public schools, who have yet to even undergo a classroom performance evaluation, can still qualify for the dubious bonus program based solely on their SAT/ACT scores.

Rep. Richard Corcoran, R-Hogwarts, who is set to become House speaker after the fall elections, and Rep. Eric Fresen, R-Severus Snape, defended their "Best & Brightest" wizardry by arguing that dispensing bonus money to teachers predicated on a standard completely unrelated to anything having to with teaching skills will serve as a snazzy retention and recruitment tool to encourage high school students to consider education as a career.

Or take a career teacher who has consistently received rave performance reviews but could be denied a bonus because 20 years ago he or she was less than a stellar student and achieved only an average SAT/ACT score. No bonus. But a first year teacher who barely knows which side of an eraser to use will be eligible for the extra money because of test scores with no correlation to mastering the art of the classroom.

How effective is a "retention/recruitment tool" that penalizes a teacher for a test taken years before one might have ever considered education as a career and that ignores the value of actual classroom experience?

How many of us would want to link our prospects for a bonus, or a raise, or a promotion, to our SAT/ACT scores from years ago? All you show-off overachievers don't count.

What lawmakers didn't take into consideration or refused to acknowledge is that the SAT/ACT is not predictive of how that person will turn out later in life.

If Tallahassee truly wants to recruit and retain great teachers, a good place to start is by showing the profession some respect.

A 40-year-old teacher should not be victimized and discriminated against on the basis of a test taken more than 20 years earlier.

Isn't it a far better recruitment/retention strategy to pay teachers a competitive wage, offer opportunities for advancement, provide a school environment that is conducive to learning and stop cooking the books that unfairly evaluates their skills? Why not treat teachers like adults who perform a vital social service to the community?

If lawmakers think it is a great idea to financially penalize teachers who long ago hardly set the SAT/ACT on fire, why not apply the same irrational standard of fitness for duty to Tallahassee?

Let's tie a member of the Florida Legislature's compensation to how well he or she scored on the SAT/ACT. And while we're at it, up the ante and require all lawmakers to take the state's standardized tests.

Think of the savings.

Some legislators might complain that basing their pay on irrelevant tests unrelated to their official duties is grossly unfair. Yeah. So?


  1. 2 hours ago• Opinion
    Editorial cartoons for Thursday LISA BENSON  |  Washington Post syndicate
  2. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is poised to play a key role in advancing three civil rights protections. [CHRIS URSO | Times]
    A federal judge and the governor send positive signals on restoring rights for felons. But the state has more work to do.
  3. Medal of Honor recipients Retired Army Maj. Drew Dix, left, and Ret. Army Sgt. Maj. Gary Littrell pose for a portrait during the start of the Medal of Honor Convention held at the Tampa Marriott Water Street in Tampa, Florida on Monday, October 21, 2019.  OCTAVIO JONES  |  Times
    Here’s what readers had to say in Thursday’s letters to the editor.
  4. Former Ambassador William Taylor leaves a closed door meeting after testifying as part of the House impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 22, 2019. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) ANDREW HARNIK  |  AP
    William Taylor demonstrates how to stand up for integrity and national purpose, says columnist Timothy O’Brien
  5. Emmett Till, shown with his mother, Mamie, was murdered in 1955 in Mississippi at age 14.
    Courage is why Emmett Till’s legacy is bulletproof. | Leonard Pitts Jr.
  6. Men and boys pose beneath the body of Lige Daniels, a black man, shortly after he was lynched on August 3, 1920, in Center, Texas.  This scene was turned into a postcard depicting the lynching.  The back reads, "He killed Earl's grandma. She was Florence's mother. Give this to Bud. From Aunt Myrtle." Wikimedia Commons
    Trump faces a constitutional process. Thousands of black men faced hate-filled lawless lynch mobs.
  7. Editorial cartoons for Wednesday CLAY BENNETT  |  Chattanooga Times Free Press
  8. Scott Israel, former Broward County Sheriff speaks during a news conference in September. A Florida Senate official is recommending that the sheriff, suspended over his handling of shootings at a Parkland high school and the Fort Lauderdale airport, should be reinstated. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson) BRYNN ANDERSON  |  AP
    The Florida Senate will vote Wednesday whether to remove or reinstate former Broward Sheriff Scott Israel. Facts, not partisan politics, should be the deciding factors.
  9. An ROTC drill team participates in competition.
    Here’s what readers had to say in Wednesday’s letters to the editor.
  10. On Oct. 17, 2019, White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney arrives to a news conference, in Washington. On Sunday, Oct. 20, on "Fox News Sunday," after acknowledging the Trump administration held up aid to Ukraine in part to prod the nation to investigate the 2016 elections, Mulvaney defended Trump’s decision to hold an international meeting at his own golf club, although the president has now dropped that plan. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) EVAN VUCCI  |  AP
    Flagrant violations are still wrong, even if made in public. | Catherine Rampell