Advertisement
  1. Opinion

Editorial: Journalists need shield law for sources

Published Aug. 16, 2013

President Barack Obama came to office promising openness and instead mounted an unprecedented campaign against anonymous leakers and the journalists who rely on those sources. A shield bill under consideration in the U.S. Senate has its flaws, but it may be better than no federal protection. The challenge will be for senators to refine the legislation when they return from their August recess.

Congressional action wouldn't be needed if all federal courts recognized a reporter's privilege under the First Amendment. Giving journalists legal protection from compelled government disclosure is essential for the free flow of information. But the federal courts have failed to establish this right for professional news gathering. A federal appeals court last month rejected efforts to shield New York Times reporter James Risen from being forced to testify on the source for his book that reported on efforts to damage Iran's nuclear program.

That leaves it to Congress to follow the lead of 40 states, including Florida, that have statutes providing at least some protection for reporters facing subpoenas. Bipartisan anger over high-profile snooping by the administration is fueling a call for federal protections. The Justice Department secretly seized the phone records of 20 Associated Press phones in an attempt to find the source who leaked information regarding a foiled terrorist plot in Yemen. AP wasn't notified for a year. The Justice Department also secretly seized the phone and email records of James Rosen, a Fox News reporter, in an investigation of a State Department leak of information about North Korea.

Outrage about these investigations prompted Attorney General Eric Holder to tighten internal rules for when the Justice Department may go after reporters' information. Now President Obama and Holder are calling for Congress to pass a journalist shield law.

The Senate bill gives journalists protection from having to respond to a federal subpoena except when all other reasonable ways of obtaining the information have been exhausted. In general, the law would give journalists the right to notice and the opportunity to be heard before their testimony is compelled and before their communication records are seized. But there are broad exceptions for national security that could erode those protections.

Another legislative challenge is defining who is a journalist entitled to the shield in this age of digital media when anyone with a website and a sponsor can claim the mantle. An initial effort at crafting a definition already has raised concerns. When the Senate Judiciary Committee debates the issue this fall, senators will have to revisit the difficulty of covering legitimate journalists without including too many who have other agendas.

To hold the government accountable, the public needs information that reporters can often obtain only from confidential sources, particularly when dealing with federal government officials and national security. Whether the story is on the administration's drone strike policy or what is happening to the prisoners at Guantanamo, reporters should not have to risk going to jail to get the truth, inform the public and protect their sources. A federal shield law would be no substitute for First Amendment rights, but it would be legislative recognition of those protections and this nation's commitment to them.

ALSO IN THIS SECTION

  1. Ayana Lage, 26, and Vagner Lage, 27, pose with a sonogram of their unborn child. Ayana writes openly about going through a miscarriage due to the baby having a rare genetic defect. She wonders why more women don't discuss their miscarriages. JOHN PENDYGRAFT   |  Times
    Sunday’s letters to the editor
  2. Kreshae Humphrey, 26, applies ointments to the skin of her 3-year-old daughter, Nevaeh Soto De Jesus, after bathing her in bottled water. The parents bathe all three of their girls with bottled water because they believe the children were sickened by the tap water at the Southern Comfort mobile home park off U.S. 19 in Clearwater. The family is suing the park's owner over the issue, but the owner and the state say there are no problems with the drinking water there. MARTHA ASENCIO-RHINE  |  Times
    The story of a Clearwater mobile home park and its water issues reflects a systemic breakdown.
  3. A long stretch of US 98 remains closed for repairs in Mexico Beach on Friday, September 27, 2019, almost one year after Hurricane Michael made landfall in the small coastal town. DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Time is running out, so let’s get practical, says Craig Fugate
  4. Earlier today• Opinion
    FROM PRINT: Adam Goodman, national Republican media consultant
    Sure, fix capitalism’s flaws, but a wealth tax is not the way. | Adam Goodman
  5. 
 CLAY BENNETT  |  Chattanooga Times Free Press
  6. A view of the downtown St. Petersburg skyline and waterfront from over Tampa Bay.
    The news that the Tampa Hillsborough Economic Development Corporation wants to change its name to include “Tampa Bay” has been met with resistance.
  7. Catherine Rampell, Washington Post columnist.
    Allegations of political cowardice can seem rich coming from candidates unwilling to acknowledge the obvious truths about things such as higher taxes. | Catherine Rampell
  8. Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., left, former Vice President Joe Biden, center, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., raise their hands to speak during a Democratic presidential primary debate hosted by CNN/New York Times at Otterbein University, Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2019, in Westerville, Ohio. (AP Photo/John Minchillo) JOHN MINCHILLO  |  AP
    Here’s some interesting commentary from the opposite poles of the political spectrum.
  9. Yesterday• Opinion
    Letters to the Editor Graphic TARA MCCARTY  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Saturday’s letters to the editor
  10. Boats docked at Central Marine in Stuart are surrounded by blue green algae in June 2016. [The Palm Beach Post]
    The Legislature should step up and stop pollution at its source, write Howard Simon and John Cassani.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement