1. Opinion

Editorial: New name, new tack on transit

Changing the name from TBX to Tampa Bay Next is more than a rebranding effort, and regional leaders and activists should take this opportunity to build state support for a more multimodal approach to solving the region’s transportation needs.
Published May 26, 2017

Opponents of Tampa Bay Express were quick to dismiss the announcement by Florida's Department of Transportation last week that it was renaming the controversial plan to rebuild the area's interstate system. But changing the name from TBX to Tampa Bay Next is more than a rebranding effort, and regional leaders and activists should take this opportunity to build state support for a more multimodal approach to solving the region's transportation needs.

The change came in response to criticism of TBX's road-centric approach, and signaled the DOT would be more inclusive in its planning and more open to rail and other forms of mass transit as part of the region's future. As originally envisioned, TBX called for rebuilding the area's interstate system, building a new northbound span of the Howard Frankland Bridge and creating 90 miles of toll lanes across the west coast of Florida.

Even under the new name, Tampa Bay Next still includes several controversial proposals, including express toll lanes on the bridge and tolls in sections of Interstates 4 and 275, downtown Tampa and around Tampa's West Shore business district. But the new plan hedges by declaring the DOT is "evaluating" most new express lanes, and the new plan underscores that any interstate improvements must be made "in the context of a comprehensive regional transportation system." That's government shorthand for balance, and it's a step forward in assuring that mass transit will play a larger role in moving this region's 3 million people.

The change in language is more than it appears, and it is the clearest indication yet of what DOT had in mind when it announced a "reset" of the plan in December. The state is going to lengths in calling for "a truly integrated, multimodal regional transportation system," and it is promoting the pitch that "transit and roads work together." There is no reason to doubt the agency; it has extended the timetable for making key decisions on transit modes, and — helpfully — handed the $6 billion project off to Gov. Rick Scott's successor, which alone should be encouraging to transit supporters. Opponents of TBX now need to figure out how to run with a win and make Tampa Bay Next deserving of broader public support.

Whatever this project's name, roadway expansion will be part of any solution. The DOT can build public faith by moving to fix the dangerous bottlenecks in the West Shore area even as it works with local governments on new mass transit options. Here again, the timetable is helpful, as two ongoing studies are already examining whether to expand Tampa's downtown streetcar and to build a regional rail system.

The DOT needlessly burned its credibility early on by plowing ahead with TBX without input or buy-in from the cross-section of the community that would be most affected. It's the agency's job to demonstrate that this new incarnation, Tampa Bay Next, is more than a marketing exercise. That certainly seems the case. But the state will need to bring hard commitments and money to the planning table. Likewise, those opposed to TBX need to recognize that roads will play a part, that the interstates are where they are, that a solution must be multimodal and that Tampa Bay Next might work.

The public needs a chance to be fully heard and for options beyond tolled lanes and highway construction to truly be on the table. The plan must be forward-looking and consider the value being either added or destroyed to these communities through the various transit modes. The one option that's unacceptable is to stay put. The state and the region need to move ahead with Tampa Bay Next in the spirit it was proposed and offer a range of transit options where they work best.


  1. Sarah Rumschlag and her son Henry Rumschlag, 7, of St. Petersburg march during the science rally and march at Poynter Park in St. Pete. KAIJO, CHARLIE  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Here’s what readers had to say in Friday’s letters to the editor.
  2. The line for free HIV testing during the Pinellas County World AIDS Day event at Williams Park in St. Petersburg. LUKE JOHNSON  |  Tampa Bay Times
    The state has mishandled the epidemic in the past, but lawmakers can get it right now. | Column
  3. The Florida Power & Light solar facility is seen in Arcadia. CHRIS URSO  |  Tampa Bay Times
    Help the markets determine winners in the renewables the Sunshine State needs. | Column
  4.  Jim Morin -- MorinToons Syndicate
  5. Noah McAdams, 3, has leukemia, and his parents didn't want to go along with the chemotherapy his doctors prescribed. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office
    The state acted correctly by interceding on behalf of Noah McAdams, a 4-year-old leukemia patient.
  6. Stephen A. Schwarzman, CEO of the Blackstone Group, speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, earlier this year. MARKUS SCHREIBER  |  AP
    The billionaire also talks trade with China in an interview with the Tampa Bay Times.
  7. Editorial cartoon for Thursday from Times wire services LISA BENSON  |  Washington Post Syndicate
  8. Yesterday• Opinion
    Plumes of steam drift from the cooling tower of FirstEnergy Corp.'s Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor, Ohio. RON SCHWANE  |  AP
    Thursday’s letters to the editor
  9. Nearly three dozen trees were cut down at a half-abandoned trailer park along Gandy Boulevard in August, enraging tree advocates and sparking another battle between the city of Tampa and a new state law that removes local government authority over tree removal. [CHARLIE FRAGO | Times]
    The Florida Legislature made it easier for residents to cut down trees without permission from local government. Now everybody wants to do it.
  10. Editorial cartoons for Wednesday from Times wire services Andy Marlette/Creators Syndicate